Reparative Memory and the Visibility of Roma Subjectivity in Otto Mueller’s ‘Gypsy’ Depictions – Anger, Pride, and Shame

Authors

  • Dezso Mate Associate Researcher, Europa–Universität Flensburg (EUF) – Interdisciplinary Centre for European Studies (ICES)
  • André Raatzsch PhD candidate in Art History at Philipps University Marburg, Research Associate

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29098/crs.v8i1.238

Keywords:

Antigypsyism, Exhibition review, Expressionism, Memory, Otto Mueller, Reparation

Abstract

This article offers a critical reflection by Romani intellectuals on their joint engagement with the Otto Mueller exhibition at the
LWL Museum of Art and Culture in Münster (2024–2025). Moving beyond an art-historical experience, the exhibition prompted a
profound confrontation with colonial memories and stereotypical representations of Romani bodies, evoking ambivalent emotions
such as anger, hope, pride, and shame Positioned as German and Hungarian Romani scholars, the authors analyse Mueller’s work
through a transnational and intersectional lens that foregrounds lived experience, collective memory, and epistemic responsibility.
At the same time, it is important to consider Mueller’s position and function within German Expressionism – connected to Die
Brücke from 1910, later professor at the State Academy in Breslau (1919–1930), and a key author of the “bathers” pictorial formula;
the subsequent denunciation and confiscation of works in the Munich “Degenerate Art” exhibition of 1937 (posthumously) further
underscores the visibility of his modern visual language in the period’s cultural discourse. The authors emphasise the necessity of visibility as subjectivity, shifting from being objectified to asserting agency in knowledge production and cultural representation. They highlight the limitations of counter-narratives within the exhibition and argue for deeper institutional reforms, including active participation of Romani scholars in curatorial practices. Drawing on feminist epistemologies and critical memory studies, the article articulates reparative memory culture as a transformative practice that challenges hegemonic narratives and centres Romani voices. Dialoguing with artworks by Tamás Péli and Małgorzata Mirga-Tas, it illustrates how Romani art creates reparative spaces of memory and dignity, contesting historical erasures. Ultimately, the article advocates for a decolonial and participatory memory politics that recognises Roma as knowledge producers and co-creators of culture, thus reshaping European art, memory, and scholarship without seeking to destroy them. 

Author Biographies

  • Dezso Mate, Associate Researcher, Europa–Universität Flensburg (EUF) – Interdisciplinary Centre for European Studies (ICES)

    Dezso Mate holds a PhD in Interdisciplinary Sociology from Eötvös Loránd University. Currently, he is a Research Fellow at Europa–Universitat Flensburg and Visiting Research Fellow at Heidelberg University – Research Centre on Antigypsyism. In 2025 he was elected as deputy chair of the Barvalipe Academy at the European Roma Institute for Arts and Culture. He also lectures at Södertörn University in the Critical Romani Studies Department. His research interests encompass the science of racism, intersectional antigypsyism, and social resilience.

  • André Raatzsch, PhD candidate in Art History at Philipps University Marburg, Research Associate

    André Raatzsch, MA, is a PhD candidate in Art History at Philipps University Marburg and a research associate in the interdisciplinary Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft “Antiziganism and Ambivalence in Europe (1850–1950)” Research Unit. From 2016 to 2025, he was a research associate at the Documentation and Cultural Center of German Sinti and Roma in Heidelberg. From 2015 to 2019, he curated the RomArchive section “Politics of Photography”. His research focuses on postcolonial image politics, visual representation, and transcultural archive and collection concepts.

Downloads

Published

12/11/2025

How to Cite

Reparative Memory and the Visibility of Roma Subjectivity in Otto Mueller’s ‘Gypsy’ Depictions – Anger, Pride, and Shame. (2025). Critical Romani Studies, 8(1), 242-255. https://doi.org/10.29098/crs.v8i1.238