Racializing American “Egyptians”: Shifting Legal Discourse, 1690s–1860s

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29098/crs.v2i2.50

Keywords:

Race, Law, Gypsy, Egyptian, United States history

Abstract

This article situates the historical “Egyptian,” more commonly referred to as “Gypsy,” into the increasingly racist legal structures formed in the British North American colonies and the early United States, between the 1690s and 1860s. It simultaneously considers how those who considered themselves, or were considered by others, as “Egyptians” or “Gypsies” navigated life in the new realities created by such laws. Despite the limitations of state-produced sources from each era under study, inferences about these people’s experiences remain significant to building a more accurate and inclusive history of the United States. The following history narrates the lives of Joan Scott, her descendants, and other nineteenth-century Americans influenced by legal
racial categories related to “Egyptians” and “Gypsies.” This is interwoven with the relevant historical contexts from American legal discourses that confirm the racialization of such categories over the centuries.

Author Biography

  • Ann Marguerite Ostendorf, Gonzaga University

    Ann Ostendorf is an historian of colonial North America and the early United States and the author of Sounds American: National Identity and the Music Cultures of the Lower Mississippi River Valley, 1800–1860. Her recent work has been to investigate the lives of diverse Romani people who lived on the North American continent from the late seventeenth through early nineteenth centuries. She is especially interested in their experiences related to racial formation and the imperial and national state.

Downloads

Published

12/02/2020

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Racializing American “Egyptians”: Shifting Legal Discourse, 1690s–1860s. (2020). Critical Romani Studies, 2(2), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.29098/crs.v2i2.50